#Iphoto windows software
#Iphoto windows code
#Iphoto windows Pc
#Iphoto windows tv

Why would I pay 400$ for an MP3 player when I can get a MP3/usb hard disk/video player/photoviewer with a compact flash drive/that can record audio and TV and has a built in speaker for 50$ more? Sorry to get off the subject of iphoto, but if I could get it for windows I would use it, but it wouldn't stop me from buying a mac because I can't afford another one anyway. Computers are changing, lifestyles are changing, Apple isn't going to be able to survive on just music and photo's for long, I hope they change their ways a little and start moving on to some of the better more desirable technologies that are available before people start realizing that it's simply not worth it. Don't fool your self, I use both and the winner for value over performance is obvious. Apple is terribly over priced, and lacks a lot of features that Microsoft will be releasing in Vista, as well as what is already available in XP.

#Iphoto windows software

Microsoft on the other hand is a software company and wants to be compatable with Apple. Why do you think you can't run MAC on an i386 platform but you can run xp on MAC? Not because a MAC is so much more powerful, because they want to sell you hardware. Of course if the software is available for windows then people wont buy mac for double the price of an i386. They are in the business of selling hardware. It's very funny because Apple is a hardware company. So as you can tell, - I think Apple is making a huge mistake, - and as a shareholder I'll possbily sell my stock soon. As a matter of fact, - if the ILife products aren't available for Windows in the next couple of years, - I'll probably switch out my use of Apple for my tune playing and organization in favor of something more compatible with my other media programs. Rather I'll keep on dishing out my cash for updates of the software I've grown use to. And even though I see an inevitability of the ILife products one day being available on the Windows platform, - at that point I'll already have adopted other software, - of which I won't want to switch at that point. Holding back IPhoto for Windows will only lead to the adoption and loyalty of Window's users to other software. And I can't seem to come around to the point of view that Window's users will ever really change over to Apple, - or vice-versa for anything related to this type of computer functionality. I wonder how many more people are like me. And so now I'll give in and go ahead and buy an Adobe product for around $100. But looking at all the recent coverage of the new IPod with photos, - its not looking to me like Apple will be releasing IPhoto for Windows like they did for ITunes anytime soon. I like the look & interface, - and was hoping to have something similar to use with my photos. I'm sure you can tell I'm no fancy hard-core programmer - or whatever. I've been waiting for a few months to buy a photo program for use on my Windows machine.

#Iphoto windows Pc

I hate the PC interface, and so make it 'more mac'. Personally, I run OS X on my mac, nut I have to use a PC in work (antiquated network running IPX) In fact, it could be argued that more people are more likely to buy Macs having experienced something like the interface they run.

Once you accept that PC users are not going to change platform, your argument falls over. Gonna shut them down because PC users like that Mac interface? Provides a Finder-like interface that can mimic OS 8/9/X Server/X. NextStep/AfterStep/LiteStep are ALL capable of looking and behaving like OS X or OS 9 for that matter. This seems to be the basis for objections to Aqua-Apps.

#Iphoto windows code

However, when it comes to all the other Aqua apps for windows, I really don't see what the problem is.ДЄ: There is going to be NO code theft by the developers.Д«: It's free, so the developers aren't even making money on it.Д¬: It runs on a totally different platform.ДЄpple aren't going to be losing money by downloading windows apps, especailly when you consider that most PCs users are not about to start using Macs 'because they look nice'! OK, I'll admit that Apple may have a case against the developers of 'iPhoto for Windows'. This legal argument really is quite tenuous.